|
First question I have is What is the music in the new Discover Card advert? Many thanks for any comment. Another question on my mind: Someone posted info about Mann-Bracken shutting down, and in it there was a link to another site. So I was searching through the site and came across what seemed to be an attorney who was posting info on how he got Midland deleted off his reports.. |
|
|
|
Hmm... I need to find out myself. I don't know what is the answer to that question. I'll do some research and get back to you if I bump into an anything. You should email the people at Discover Card as they probably could assist you..
|
|
+1.
A properly worded letter (which everyone assumes they write but, rarely do) is all it takes.. When a CA is after you for a legitimate debt, flying in on private jets and using gold embossed anything will probably just make them look for assets to attach.. Do you think you would look "unsophisticated" to a judge/jury if the letters you wrote looked like the ones you purpose?.. |
|
I couldn't agree more with hege and bobby. Clowning around doesn't get you taken seriously, be it fancy paper, teal ink or otherwise. Just write what you mean to say, understand what you have written, and if you're unsure, post it here (sans the personal details of course) and have everyone look it over..
It's all business, after all, nobody is impressed by your fancy letterhead. An actual human is unlikely to even read most of your letters, at least when it comes to the CRA's... |
|
What worries me is, if this DV ended up in court. Then what would a judge say when he saw my "play with words"..
|
|
I wasn't talking about the DV, because that's early on in the process. But even if it did end up in court, judges and people in general know that these deadbeats use similar and worse tactics on us (convert debt to a credit card, etc), so seeing a fancy letter would not raise any eyebrows. If it did, lemme meet the judge in question..
The content of the letter, be it 623 letter or even if someone were to use it as a DV, doesn't change. You don't skip steps. Just the messenger is dressed in a tux versus jeans and a t-shirt. Most here don't like the tactic, I can respect that. My goal was to get thoughts on this tactic in reference to human behavior and perception and if it would make a difference or not.. This post has been edited by. Cooliojones. : 19 January 2010 - 10:04 PM.. |
|
I think it would cause a negative difference, if any at all..
A difference I am all for is hiring Rip Taylor as a process server. Throwing all that glitter and crap around while serving people. That would be great... |
|
I treat every letter I send from a DV to a 623, as that letter might end up in court. Now the fancy paper and envelops I do not have an issue with. But adding "From the office of....." I worry if a judge might not like that...
|
|
I would guess that unless it actually says it's from an attorney it's not going to do much good. Fancy paper and envelope isn't going to fool or impress anyone IMO. Worth a try though...
|
