Want the latest Discover Card Deals?

Just enter your email address below and we'll send you secret Discover Card deals every month.
Email Address:

Quick question: "Virtual Webcard Credit/Debit Visa or Discover Card? Many thanks for any response. Second question.. I sent a DV to a CA and they responded as if they were the OC. Something doesn't seem right about their wording in this and I'm too new to know if they are allowed to validate like this..

>.

We have notified the credit reporting agencies we subscribe to that this account is disputed by the consumer. Having.

Verified.

The accuracy and completeness of the debt in question, we are now free to include this in our monthly credit report file and to resume our collecion efforts..

If you have any additional supporting documentation concering the accuracy or completeness of the reported data, we will be glad to reopen this.

Investigation.

We will not.

Investigate.

Disputes that are irrelevant, frivolous, or disputes that have previously been invstigated, unless we are provided with additonal relevant documentation..

It gives all the proper information I'd expect in a DV including the mandatory inclusion of the California Rosenthal disclaimer at the bottom. But the question is, why would they write the above paragraphs as if they are the OC?.

Thank you..

asked Mar 04 at 10:34

Madalyn
's gravatar image

Madalyn
65


That's a good question. I'm not sure what is the answer to your question. I'll do some research and get back to you if I bump into an good answer. You should email the people at Discover Card as they probably know..

answered Mar 04 at 12:03

Madyson
's gravatar image

Madyson
4525

Their language actually sounds like it came from a CRA and could be overshadowing, but the first question I have is did they provide you with verification? If not, their statement in the first paragraph, "having verified the accuracy and completeness of the debt in question" is absolutely false and misleading...

answered Mar 04 at 13:30

Finn's gravatar image

Finn
2638

They did, and an excellent job of it, no 10% annual interest allowed by California either, DOFD is 6/25/04 so this is about to go away in a year, I was just wondering if I could attack it because of the language in the DV response..

This post has been edited by.

Stefang31.

: 21 January 2010 - 09:10 AM..

answered Mar 04 at 14:23

Jack's gravatar image

Jack
3555

If they validated I'd say they are in the clear..

Since they are reporting to the CRAs they are subject to FCRA 1682s-2. Section (a)(8)(F) talks about their right to determine a dispute is frivolous. They're not required to notify you of this until they actually determine your dispute is frivolous, but it looks like this CA is just extra thorough...

answered Mar 04 at 15:39

Kayden
's gravatar image

Kayden
4425

BETWEEN REFUSING TO CORRECT ERRORS THAT ANYBODY COULD SEE...and BOGUS F/A's...and CALLING EVERY DISPUTE FRIVOLOUS...I DON'T KNOW WHY THEY EVEN LET US EVEN SEE OUR CREDIT REPORTS..

answered Mar 04 at 15:47

Dustin's gravatar image

Dustin
1446

So they called your dispute.

FRIVOLOUS.

That gives them the right to report and collect.

Nice that you don't agree....

I GUESS YOU DON'T COUNT..

answered Mar 04 at 16:53

Makayla
's gravatar image

Makayla
3471

Your answer
toggle preview

powered by OSQA